📌 Why Do Enterprises Need Consulting Instead of Direct Development?

In the AI and Web4 domains, the primary challenge most enterprises face is not "can we do it," but rather:

❓ What direction is the right one?

❓ Which technologies are truly valuable?

❓ How to avoid projects with high investment but no output?

❓ How to integrate new technologies with existing business?

🚨 The Reality: Development Without Consulting Often Leads to Dead Ends

Blind Start → Wrong Tech Stack → Repeated Requirement Changes → Development Cost Overruns → Project Failure
              ↓
        Team Loses Confidence → Leadership Questions AI Value → Missed Real Opportunities

✔️ The Value of Consulting Is Not "Writing Reports," But Establishing a Clear Decision-making Path for Enterprises

→ Helping you think through before development investment: whether to do it, what to do, how to do it, how much to spend, and how much to earn.

🎯 We Don't Solve Technical Problems, But Decision-making Problems

Magicsoft's industry consulting service focuses on helping enterprises establish a quantifiable, executable, and reviewable judgment system.

Decision Dimension	Common Enterprise Confusion	What Our Consulting Can Provide
Technology Trends	Large models, blockchain, smart contracts... which one is relevant to me?	Technology Adaptation Matrix + Industry Benchmark Analysis
Input-Output	If I invest 1 million, how much will I get back? How soon will I break even?	Phased ROI Model + Cash Flow Forecast
Product Path	Should I build tools, platforms, or solutions first?	Product Ladder Diagram + Commercialization Path Design
Market Opportunities	Is it real demand or a false trend? Have competitors already done it?	Demand Validation Report + Competitive Landscape Map

🎯 In One Sentence: We don't do AI or Web4 for you, but help you do it right.

🔧 How Consulting Services Unfold (Five-Step Method)

We don't just provide a static report, but engage in "participatory consulting" to deeply involve ourselves in the enterprise decision-making process. Each step includes discussion, output, and confirmation.

① Business and Current State Analysis
   ↓  (Identify highest-value entry points)
② Technical Path Design
   ↓  (Avoid over-engineering)
③ Product and Model Design
   ↓  (Ensure profitability/cost reduction)
④ Architecture and Implementation Planning
   ↓  (Feasible, scalable)
⑤ Risk Assessment and Optimization Recommendations
   ↓
🔄 Iterate until direction is clear

Detailed Description of Each Stage (Including Typical Work Content)

Stage	Core Work	Typical Deliverables	Time Reference
① Business and Current State Analysis	Interview core teams, inventory existing IT assets, analyze business KPIs and pain points	"Business Diagnosis Report" "AI/Web4 Opportunity Map"	1~2 weeks
② Technical Path Design	Compare different technical solutions (large models/traditional models/on-chain off-chain), assess maturity	"Technical Selection Comparison Table" "POC Proposal"	1 week
③ Product and Model Design	Design user journeys, pricing models, key metrics (e.g., how much to reduce customer service costs)	"Product Architecture Diagram" "Business Model Canvas"	1~2 weeks
④ Architecture and Implementation Planning	Clarify system modules, development sequence, resource budget, milestones	"System Architecture Diagram" "Implementation Roadmap" "Budget Table"	1 week
⑤ Risk Assessment and Optimization	Identify technical risks, compliance risks, data security risks, provide contingency plans	"Risk List" "Response Strategy Table"	0.5 weeks

🔁 After each stage, we conduct a review and confirmation meeting with the client to ensure alignment before proceeding to the next stage.

📦 Consulting Deliverables (Complete Deliverables List)

We commit to delivering actionable and executable content, rejecting empty theories:

Category	Specific Deliverables	Purpose
Trends and Opportunities	Industry technology maturity curve, 3-year trend forecast	Judge entry timing
Product and Business	Product feature list, user journey map, pricing strategy	Guide product design
Architecture and Technology	Technology stack list, API design draft, data flow diagram	Guide development selection
Implementation and Budget	Gantt chart, staffing table, hardware and software procurement list	Guide project management
Risks and Returns	Sensitivity analysis table (optimistic/neutral/pessimistic), compliance checklist	Guide decision filing

✅ All deliverables are oriented toward enterprise business objectives as the primary goal, with actionable recommendations (rather than multiple-choice questions).

🧩 Service Models (Flexible Options, Enterprise Retains Decision-making Authority)

Service Model	Suitable Scenarios	Service Characteristics	Enterprise Investment
Advisory Consulting	Enterprise has some ideas, needs external validation	Output by milestones, lightweight and efficient	Low (2~4 weeks)
Deep Partnership	End-to-end from 0 to 1, lacking internal AI capabilities	Embedded in enterprise project team, participating in all key decisions	Medium-High (2~6 months)
Customized Special Consulting	For specific pain points (e.g., model compliance, chain selection)	Precise solutions, rapid delivery	Low (1~2 weeks)

🚀 Advantage Comparison (vs Traditional Consulting Firms)

Comparison Item	Traditional Consulting	Magicsoft Industry Consulting
Delivery Format	Heavy PDF reports	Executable solutions + partnership
Technical Depth	Strategy-focused, lacking practical experience	Understands code, models, and chains
Follow-up Implementation	Doesn't handle or charges separately	Can seamlessly transition to development phase
Pricing Model	High fixed fees	Flexible pricing by stage/by problem

🌟 Changes Ultimately Brought to Enterprises (From Chaos to Clarity)

Dimensions of Change

Dimension of Change	Typical State Before Consulting	Typical State After Consulting
Direction Clarity	Vague, following trends, leadership making decisions blindly	Clear, data-backed, team consensus
Resource Utilization Efficiency	Low, reinventing the wheel	High, reusing existing capabilities
Technical Risk	High, wrong stack or over-design	Low, validated path
Business-Technology Alignment	Fragmented, mutual complaints	Deep integration, shared KPIs
Investment Return Expectations	Unclear, afraid to invest	Quantifiable, phased validation

Visual Analogy

【Before Consulting】                   【After Consulting】
Following trends blindly                Strategic advancement
Technology-driven (can do anything)     Business-driven (do what makes money)
Unpredictable project cycles            Clear milestones
Scattered resources                     Focused resources
Team anxiety                            Team confidence

💬 A Real Scenario (Illustrative Example)

A mid-sized e-commerce enterprise wanted to introduce AI customer service but was unsure whether to build in-house, purchase, or customize.

Through industry consulting, we helped them in just 2 weeks:

• Analyzed cost comparisons of 3 solutions (see table below)

• Tested the accuracy of 5 large models on the market in customer service scenarios

• Designed a path of "start with large model API cold launch → fine-tune after accumulating data → finally private deployment"

• Ultimately helped them save approximately 600,000 in blind development costs in the first year.

Solution	First Year Cost	Time to Launch	Controllability	Recommendation
In-house Development	1.2M+	6~9 months	High	⭐⭐
SaaS Purchase	180K	2 weeks	Low	⭐⭐⭐
Customization (Post-consulting)	450K	3 months	Medium-High	⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

✅ Summary (Reiterated)

It's not about doing AI or Web4 for you, but about helping you do it right.

If you are hesitating:

👉 "Should we do it?"

👉 "What direction should we take?"

👉 "How to avoid pitfalls?"

Welcome to start with an industry consulting engagement — we will help you find the most worthwhile path forward in the shortest time.

Previous pageData Analytics System

Next pageLarge Model Fine-tuning